Timeline for 2013 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/ with https://webmasters.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 14:05 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| May 14, 2013 at 12:44 | history | closed | Grace NoteStaffMod | too localized | |
| May 14, 2013 at 12:44 | history | edited | Grace NoteStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add link to questions, remove featured tag.
|
| May 10, 2013 at 20:15 | comment | added | David K. | +1 for that. I wholeheartedly agree. We need more nominees and more activity. | |
| May 10, 2013 at 17:02 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | @DKOATED I wouldn't worry about that particular thing then. The lack of activity is an issue, whether or not anyone tries to take advantage of it. More focus on correcting that, over suspicion, would be my advice. | |
| May 10, 2013 at 15:57 | comment | added | David K. | understood and agreed. yet, based on the last couple of days activity here on meta and on the nomination page itself, it seems there aren't quite that many actively participating ... hence my raised concern ... | |
| May 10, 2013 at 15:55 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | @DKOATED Given a single nominee can only influence any particular post at most two spaces (voting it one direction, and all opposing points the opposite direction), it would have to be very close for this to have any significant impact in any particular candidate's favor. Past that, if we take multiples into account, then that's as much community voice as anything else. | |
| May 10, 2013 at 15:52 | comment | added | David K. | I second that, although in all fairness, I'd make nominees not able to participate in any kind of up-/downvoting. This would just distort the outcome of the top voted questions... or wouldn't it? | |
| May 10, 2013 at 8:52 | answer | added | paulmorriss | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 10:49 | answer | added | Simon Hayter | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 1:43 | answer | added | user6901 | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 7, 2013 at 22:49 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/331903752208535554 | ||
| May 7, 2013 at 19:32 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| May 7, 2013 at 16:09 | answer | added | paulmorriss | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 7, 2013 at 16:07 | comment | added | paulmorriss | I think this process is a good idea as it allows people to take part who can't necessarily make a town hall meeting for whatever reason, including timezones. | |
| S May 7, 2013 at 11:24 | answer | added | Grace NoteStaffMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| S May 7, 2013 at 11:24 | history | asked | Grace NoteStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |