Timeline for Why was a 10 year old question/ answer suddenly marked as low quality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2021 at 0:04 | vote | accept | Steve | ||
| Feb 1, 2021 at 22:14 | comment | added | Steve | I have a knack for finding this sort of stuff ;o) | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 11:25 | comment | added | Glorfindel | Wait, now I realize I posted a bug report a couple of months ago... | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 11:22 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 423 characters in body
|
| Feb 1, 2021 at 11:22 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller Mod | My theory is that the automated checks for low quality that are typically run on new posts are sometimes run against old posts. I'm not sure of the mechanics of how that would work though. If staff is doing that they have to have set it up in a way to have them trickle in and not flood the queues. | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 11:18 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller Mod | The only thing there is the an entry for the post creation with the type "Initial Body." | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 11:17 | comment | added | Glorfindel | @StephenOstermiller thanks for checking. That is really surprising. There is nothing here either? webmasters.stackexchange.com/admin/posts/12238/show-flags | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 11:03 | comment | added | Stephen Ostermiller Mod | I don't see anything in the timeline for that answer that indicates that it was flagged. The only entries are that it was created, that it entered the review queue, and that the review was completed. The "show flag history" for it in the moderator options in greyed out which I think indicates that it has never been flagged. | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 7:17 | history | answered | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |